<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brave New Car Dealer: fingerprints required to buy a car?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lorna</title>
		<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/#comment-4357</link>
		<dc:creator>lorna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/?p=141#comment-4357</guid>
		<description>I'd guess most of the Dollar Rent A Car fraud was aimed at reselling stolen parts for things like Toyotas. There's something to be said for having mass market consumers for your chop-shop parts.

I don't have any info about fraud directly from dealers, you would know this better than I, but there are two BMW models on the HLDI 10 most stolen new car list, the 7 series and the X5. Most people who would be buying a 7 series or an X5 probably should be able to provide two forms of photo ID, like a license and a passport.  Many state agencies don't ever require more data than that, although the new RFID passports are reportedly insecure, and hey, have you seen those new ink-jet printers? 

I suspect the IRS has many reasons for tracking high dollar cash sales, but it seems that is much more likely due to people notoriously forgetting to claim cash transactions on their tax returns. The IRS doesn't care about stopping car theft - they don't even require a thumbprint to file your taxes.  Ahem.

I'm closing comments because I really don't need any more offers for cheap viagra and it's killing my blackberry battery. If you have more to say, you can always reach me at the email address you'd expect.

I still don't feel like I have a clear answer on why or how thumbprinting deters car thieves, but I've learned a lot in the last week.  Thank you all for the comments and conversation - this has been a much more interesting adventure than I thought I would be having when I walked into a car dealership last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d guess most of the Dollar Rent A Car fraud was aimed at reselling stolen parts for things like Toyotas. There&#8217;s something to be said for having mass market consumers for your chop-shop parts.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any info about fraud directly from dealers, you would know this better than I, but there are two BMW models on the HLDI 10 most stolen new car list, the 7 series and the X5. Most people who would be buying a 7 series or an X5 probably should be able to provide two forms of photo ID, like a license and a passport.  Many state agencies don&#8217;t ever require more data than that, although the new RFID passports are reportedly insecure, and hey, have you seen those new ink-jet printers? </p>
<p>I suspect the IRS has many reasons for tracking high dollar cash sales, but it seems that is much more likely due to people notoriously forgetting to claim cash transactions on their tax returns. The IRS doesn&#8217;t care about stopping car theft - they don&#8217;t even require a thumbprint to file your taxes.  Ahem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m closing comments because I really don&#8217;t need any more offers for cheap viagra and it&#8217;s killing my blackberry battery. If you have more to say, you can always reach me at the email address you&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t feel like I have a clear answer on why or how thumbprinting deters car thieves, but I&#8217;ve learned a lot in the last week.  Thank you all for the comments and conversation - this has been a much more interesting adventure than I thought I would be having when I walked into a car dealership last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evlfred</title>
		<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/#comment-4355</link>
		<dc:creator>evlfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/?p=141#comment-4355</guid>
		<description>I would say that while on the surface the Dollar-Rent-A-Car issue would seem to relate, I don't think it applies.  For one, I really doubt that there are chop shops out there just itching for Dollar-Rent-A-Car vehicles to process, but I'm sure any would be ready for a new brand new BMW.  Second, why would an identity thief go to all the trouble of researching someone and taking all their info to go down and rent a car?  Not much profit in it.  Third, when someone is laundering money, new vehicles are considered prime property, that's why the IRS makes us report all cash sales in excess of $9999, and I would imagine new BMW's are on top of the list for launderers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that while on the surface the Dollar-Rent-A-Car issue would seem to relate, I don&#8217;t think it applies.  For one, I really doubt that there are chop shops out there just itching for Dollar-Rent-A-Car vehicles to process, but I&#8217;m sure any would be ready for a new brand new BMW.  Second, why would an identity thief go to all the trouble of researching someone and taking all their info to go down and rent a car?  Not much profit in it.  Third, when someone is laundering money, new vehicles are considered prime property, that&#8217;s why the IRS makes us report all cash sales in excess of $9999, and I would imagine new BMW&#8217;s are on top of the list for launderers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorna</title>
		<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>lorna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/?p=141#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>wow, I need to close the comments on this post soon due to all the incoming spam, but I really don't want to.

evlfred, thanks again for the comments. point taken regarding profit / loss. As for not liking the policy, that's the exact point I want to make. You can always go elsewhere, but I believe it's actually important to say no when you don't like someone's made-up, non-standard policy.

Here's a totally straightforward question for you.  If a 100% loss on a stolen car comes to $50 per car (the four lost cars number came directly from the dealership in question, the average cost number may be off but with four lost cars it seems like it's the right ballpark), why wouldn't a dealer simply add that into the price for all new cars, rather than trying to take fingerprints? That's usually what a store does when there's loss: prices go up.  Why would you decide to fingerprint all your customers? Where does that even come from?  Most customers aren't going to shop elsewhere to save $50 on a $30K purchase. I wouldn't, but I was so surprised with the fingerprint demand that I went home and wrote about it.  I suppose if you don't know a dealer's doing this, you get stuck with the demand at the end of the process and comply, but at least if you know some dealers are doing it, you have the choice to shop around to one that doesn't. 

In terms of keeping things secure, especially in any kind of retail environment I've worked in places where I was astonished by the amount of unsecured data, and I've worked in places that were unbelieveably careful. Both places would claim to be extremely careful and you can't tell from the outside what you're dealing with. UCLA was extremely careful - they had a break-in anyway.  I believe completely that your dealership is careful, and I'm sure there are many dealerships that take this very seriously, but after this whole experience I am reminded why it's important to not offer up information when you're not legally bound to do so. 

I'm glad to hear there's a lot of concern from the auto sales industry regarding this. When these guys presented me with a photocopied legal-ish document with spelling mistakes, that's when I started thinking: maybe this company is not as careful as I would like for them to be.  And that's when I walked out, and I'd do it again if the same thing happened tomorrow. If one good thing came out of it, people who've read this post will be more aware and careful with how any personal data is used. 

I read up on many of the topics you mentioned above while learning about all this. And my conclusion is that when a merchant asks for extra information that isn't legally required to close the sale, it is because they are trying to protect their own interests, and often at the potential risk of my own interests.  

Curious, what do you think about the Dollar-Rent-A-Car results from their similar thumbprint experiment? The company dropped it, because it bothered customers and in the end it didn't make a difference to their bottom line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, I need to close the comments on this post soon due to all the incoming spam, but I really don&#8217;t want to.</p>
<p>evlfred, thanks again for the comments. point taken regarding profit / loss. As for not liking the policy, that&#8217;s the exact point I want to make. You can always go elsewhere, but I believe it&#8217;s actually important to say no when you don&#8217;t like someone&#8217;s made-up, non-standard policy.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a totally straightforward question for you.  If a 100% loss on a stolen car comes to $50 per car (the four lost cars number came directly from the dealership in question, the average cost number may be off but with four lost cars it seems like it&#8217;s the right ballpark), why wouldn&#8217;t a dealer simply add that into the price for all new cars, rather than trying to take fingerprints? That&#8217;s usually what a store does when there&#8217;s loss: prices go up.  Why would you decide to fingerprint all your customers? Where does that even come from?  Most customers aren&#8217;t going to shop elsewhere to save $50 on a $30K purchase. I wouldn&#8217;t, but I was so surprised with the fingerprint demand that I went home and wrote about it.  I suppose if you don&#8217;t know a dealer&#8217;s doing this, you get stuck with the demand at the end of the process and comply, but at least if you know some dealers are doing it, you have the choice to shop around to one that doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>In terms of keeping things secure, especially in any kind of retail environment I&#8217;ve worked in places where I was astonished by the amount of unsecured data, and I&#8217;ve worked in places that were unbelieveably careful. Both places would claim to be extremely careful and you can&#8217;t tell from the outside what you&#8217;re dealing with. UCLA was extremely careful - they had a break-in anyway.  I believe completely that your dealership is careful, and I&#8217;m sure there are many dealerships that take this very seriously, but after this whole experience I am reminded why it&#8217;s important to not offer up information when you&#8217;re not legally bound to do so. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear there&#8217;s a lot of concern from the auto sales industry regarding this. When these guys presented me with a photocopied legal-ish document with spelling mistakes, that&#8217;s when I started thinking: maybe this company is not as careful as I would like for them to be.  And that&#8217;s when I walked out, and I&#8217;d do it again if the same thing happened tomorrow. If one good thing came out of it, people who&#8217;ve read this post will be more aware and careful with how any personal data is used. </p>
<p>I read up on many of the topics you mentioned above while learning about all this. And my conclusion is that when a merchant asks for extra information that isn&#8217;t legally required to close the sale, it is because they are trying to protect their own interests, and often at the potential risk of my own interests.  </p>
<p>Curious, what do you think about the Dollar-Rent-A-Car results from their similar thumbprint experiment? The company dropped it, because it bothered customers and in the end it didn&#8217;t make a difference to their bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evlfred</title>
		<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/#comment-4353</link>
		<dc:creator>evlfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/?p=141#comment-4353</guid>
		<description>FTC’s Information Safeguards Rule and the Consumer Information Disposal Rule are both applied to dealerships and enforced rigorously.  Not to mention the Privacy act, the Equal Opportunity Credit Act, and yes, the Patriot Act to some degree.  Read an industry publication sometime (like Dealer magazine available online) every issue there are several articles about "compliance", meaning compliance with Laws and Regulations in the auto industry.  I think it would be a real eye opener for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FTC’s Information Safeguards Rule and the Consumer Information Disposal Rule are both applied to dealerships and enforced rigorously.  Not to mention the Privacy act, the Equal Opportunity Credit Act, and yes, the Patriot Act to some degree.  Read an industry publication sometime (like Dealer magazine available online) every issue there are several articles about &#8220;compliance&#8221;, meaning compliance with Laws and Regulations in the auto industry.  I think it would be a real eye opener for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evlfred</title>
		<link>http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/2007/03/17/141/#comment-4351</link>
		<dc:creator>evlfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lornamatic.com/wordpress/?p=141#comment-4351</guid>
		<description>It wouldn't be 25% of the loss, they don't make 100% profit on every car they sell, and the other commenter's numbers are way off too.  If a dealer looses a car to theft they loose the profit equal to at least 20 cars.  And most won't claim it on insurance, because their insurance rate (which would shock you) would rise alot.  I've had customers refuse to provide even a drivers license copy to me, and we refused to sell them a car.  In one case a lady was so upset she tried to call the governors office to "tell on us".  The bottom line is, if that's what that dealership requires and you don't like it, go elsewhere.  Obviously, it is helping them reduce losses, or they wouldn't be doing it. 

Also, don't bother trying to get the dealership to return all copies of your information.  If they pulled a credit bureau on you they are required by low to maintain that information for at least 24 months.  However they are also required to keep it secure with limited access.  We are very careful with all information left with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be 25% of the loss, they don&#8217;t make 100% profit on every car they sell, and the other commenter&#8217;s numbers are way off too.  If a dealer looses a car to theft they loose the profit equal to at least 20 cars.  And most won&#8217;t claim it on insurance, because their insurance rate (which would shock you) would rise alot.  I&#8217;ve had customers refuse to provide even a drivers license copy to me, and we refused to sell them a car.  In one case a lady was so upset she tried to call the governors office to &#8220;tell on us&#8221;.  The bottom line is, if that&#8217;s what that dealership requires and you don&#8217;t like it, go elsewhere.  Obviously, it is helping them reduce losses, or they wouldn&#8217;t be doing it. </p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t bother trying to get the dealership to return all copies of your information.  If they pulled a credit bureau on you they are required by low to maintain that information for at least 24 months.  However they are also required to keep it secure with limited access.  We are very careful with all information left with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
